I moved the sandbox stuff but I did not create the components yet. I'll wait to see what people think about * or (sbx) or whatever.
Also, I deleted the 'other' component so most issues are now unassigned to a component. If there is no issue that makes sense to assign them to they can stay there. Otherwise we should gradually assign them over time. (Defnitely before we resolve them.) Sean On 2/21/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The only thing I worry about is searching on a * char. Maybe a (sbx) > or something? > > On 2/21/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 2/21/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I was thinking of creating one component for each sandbox. So people > > > who are interested in a particular component can easily see (and maybe > > > > makes sense > > > > > fix) those issues. Perhaps a * character at the end of the component > > > name to remind us this is sandbox? > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > Sean > > > > > > On 2/21/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Ah, I see. > > > > Thanks for the informations. > > > > I'll help to *edit* some issues. > > > > > > > > So for sandbox, we just create a *component* inside of TOMAHAWK and > > > > *store* all issue under this label, right ? > > > > > > > > -Matthias > > > > > > > > On 2/21/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > FYI we disabled email notification to the list when you edit an issue > > > > > (change the name, description, version or component.) This will cut > > > > > down on some our JIRA traffic. Also, no emails to the list when > > > > > moving an issue between projects. > > > > > > > > > > The issue reporter, the assignee and watchers will still be notified. > > > > > > > > > > Sean > > > > > > > > > > On 2/21/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > thanks!!!! > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2/21/06, Arvid Hülsebus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Just click on "Edit this issue" in the sidebar under Operations > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > assign a new component. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > Arvid > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > > > > > > > > may be a silly question, > > > > > > > > but how to change / move a bug to a special component > > > > > > > > e.g. from other -> tree2 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Matthias > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2/21/06, Bruno Aranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Thanks Sean for the hard work, > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> +1 from me to put sandox under tomahawk. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> Regards, > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> Bruno > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> On 2/21/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >>> Thanks Sean! > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>>> I have moved all of the tomahawk issues (at least the ones > > > > > > > >>>> marked > > > > > > > >>>> tomahawk in the original jira) to the new JIRA project. > > > > > > > >>>> JIRA is also > > > > > > > >>>> smart enough to map the old issue numbers with new issue > > > > > > > >>>> numbers. So > > > > > > > >>>> if you try to navigate to MYFACES-975[1], JIRA knows enough > > > > > > > >>>> to > > > > > > > >>>> redirect you to TOMAHAWK-96. > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>> this is cool :-) > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>>> I have not moved the sandbox stuff yet. My thinking is that > > > > > > > >>>> sandbox > > > > > > > >>>> components should be part of the Tomahawk JIRA since they > > > > > > > >>>> are part of > > > > > > > >>>> the same maven subproject and they will eventually be > > > > > > > >>>> promoted to > > > > > > > >>>> Tomahawk. They will also always have the same versions as > > > > > > > >>>> Tomahawk. > > > > > > > >>>> If I get some +1's I will move these also. > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>> I am +1 on having sandox stuff under tomahawk. for the > > > > > > > >>> reasons you pointed out > > > > > > > >>> -maven subproject > > > > > > > >>> -promotion > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> Sounds reasonable to me > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> -Matthias > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>>> I haven't changed the permissions or notification at all. > > > > > > > >>>> We can talk > > > > > > > >>>> about that at a future point once we get everything into the > > > > > > > >>>> right > > > > > > > >>>> spot. Take a look and let me know what you think. > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> Sean > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-975 > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>>> > > > > > > > >>> -- > > > > > > > >>> Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > > >>> Zülpicher Wall 12, 239 > > > > > > > >>> 50674 Köln > > > > > > > >>> http://www.wessendorf.net > > > > > > > >>> mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > > > Zülpicher Wall 12, 239 > > > > > > > > 50674 Köln > > > > > > > > http://www.wessendorf.net > > > > > > > > mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > > > Zülpicher Wall 12, 239 > > > > > > 50674 Köln > > > > > > http://www.wessendorf.net > > > > > > mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Matthias Wessendorf > > > > Zülpicher Wall 12, 239 > > > > 50674 Köln > > > > http://www.wessendorf.net > > > > mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Matthias Wessendorf > > Zülpicher Wall 12, 239 > > 50674 Köln > > http://www.wessendorf.net > > mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com > > >
