I don't think there's any hard rule that all projects have to be prefixed with MyFaces. But then, I also don't have any problem with it being associated with Tomahawk or MyFaces (in the name).
On 10/29/07, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > I agree that MyFaces Basics is too MyFaces-Core-esque. Tomahawk > > Basics or JSF Basics would be better choices. > > > Hmmm ... I think the "MyFaces JSF Basics" is the only option then. As > far as I know the token "MyFaces" needs to be in there as it is a > project of the "MyFaces" project. > > Personally I think the token "tomahawk" suggest that the Basic module is > meant as something related to tomahawk only then. > > Also we should clearly state in the future that the term MyFaces does > not not necessarily mean a module works only with the MyFaces JSF > implementation nor with tomahawk only. But I think this is something we > already do as good as we can, e.g. with Apache MyFaces Trinidad, Apache > MyFaces Orchestra. > Btw, Tobago is an exception here, they call their project just Tobago > instead of "Apache MyFaces Tobago" as it should be ... I think. > > Ciao, > Mario > >
