Sounds good!

regards,

Martin

On 2/6/08, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
> > Sounds good - can you send your example again utilizing the
> > detailStamp approach if that fits?
> So, not it is getting "stressy" again. I have a bad need for it now.
>
> So, using the detailStamp approach it might look like:
>
> <t:datable var="group1" value="#{bean.data}">
> ...
>    <t:column colspan="10">
>        <t:outputText value="#{group1.headerValue}" />
>    </t:column>
>    <f:facet name="detailStamp">
>      <t:datable var="group2" value="#{group1.groupData}" embedded="true">
>          <t:column colspan="2">
>              <t:outputText value="#{group2.headerValue2}" />
>          </t:column>
>          <t:column colspan="8">
>              <t:outputText value="#{group2.headerValue2}" />
>          </t:column>
>          <f:facet name="detailStamp">
>            <t:datable var="detail" value="#{group2.detailData}"
> embedded="true">
>                <t:column>
>                    <t:outputText value="#{detail.value1}" />
>                </t:column>
> ....
>                <t:column>
>                    <t:outputText value="#{detail.value10}" />
>                </t:column>
>          </t:datable>
>        </f:facet>
>     </t:datable>
>   </f:facet>
> </t:datable>
>
> Additionally I'd like to introduce a headerStamp and footerStamp which
> renders into the head/foot of the table (if possible) and thus allows
> you to have multi-row header/footer.
> Effectively these new stamps might work with an embedded datatable only
> (for now).
>
> I'll start doing so now, ok?
>
> Ciao,
> Mario
>
>


-- 

http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces

Reply via email to