On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 10:24 PM, simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 20:38 +0100, Thomas Spiegl wrote: > > Hi orchestra team, > > > > just used orchestra in one of my projects, works really great - thanks > > for your effort! > > Great - thanks for the feedback. > > Did you use the persistence stuff, or just the plain > conversation-scoping? I used both, extendes persistence context & orchestra scopes. Worked both fine for me.
> > > > > > Are there any plans to release orchestra-core-1.1? > > Yes. Hopefully either Mario or I will post an RC tomorrow or the day > after, and start the vote. > http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/ReleasePlanForCore1%2e1 great to hear. I'll test it as soon as it's available > > > > > > When looking through the project I was missing ... > > 1) download link for orchestra-core-1.0 on > > http://myfaces.apache.org/download.html > > Yep. The last release was just to the maven repo. It's rather tempting > to do the same again, actually. Is a download bundle actually useful to > anyone? yes, not everyone is using maven out there. Some people are missing the download links. > > > > 2) release of orchestra-core15-1.0 > > We're working on it, but there's quite a lot of effort still needed. It > all works (and is being used in production) but needs a lot of polishing > before a stable API can be declared. Probably a couple of months away.. Really months? What do you plan to change/polish? > > > > 3) release of orchestra-core-1.1 > > documentation is really good & up to date, but already refers to > > orchestra-core-1.1-SNAPSHOT. It isn't fully compliant to release 1.0 > > and therefore confusing for someone using release 1.0 > > Agreed. But there isn't enough manpower ATM to write both 1.0 and 1.1 > docs. I have *tried* to indicate where 1.0 and 1.1 differ. If there are > any bits that are misleading please let me know. I did not write down the differences. A new release would help to be up to date. > > Ideally there would be different websites for different releases. The > Maven project has just moved to this approach for plugin docs, but are > still ironing out the problems; I don't know of any other project that > has yet managed to do this. And unfortunately I don't have time to be a > leader in this area - but am happy to be a follower if someone can show > how it can be done. > > > > 4) an example for @ConversationRequire? > > I'll update the docs in the next few days to improve that. Another user > also pointed out that we need to better document the spring > conversationName attribute. > > The Orchestra Examples project does use this annotation, so you can look > there for information but it does need to also be on the website docs. thanks, managed to get it working - the feature is just likely to be missed reading the docs. > > Cheers, Simon > > > ciao, Thomas -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
