On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 6:05 PM, Andrew Robinson < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/MyfacesBuilderPlugin > > Is this supposed to be a solution to the code replacement? I don't > recall any vote to achieve a resolution on how to go about the code > generation. From what this looks like, it looks worse than the current > trinidad plugin. Embedding data in javadoc is really awful IMO. > > Or am I mistaken and this is just the tomahawk code builder? > This wiki is the idea that Simon proposed for code generation in a more concrete presentation based on the comments on the mailing list and the starting code proposed on. https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/myfaces-build-tools/branches/skitching Actually, I have worked a lot with myfaces-faces-plugin (older trinidad build), I have full component generation for tomahawk 1.1 and 1.2 ready for commit, and really I think that myfaces-faces-plugin is a great tool (clear wiki, easy to understand and make it work, but sometimes a little bit complex doing uncommon tasks). If it was my decision, I will continue using myfaces-faces-plugin, commit tomahawk, upgrade components from sandbox and release. It's clear that all solutions proposed for this issue (Code Generation) sucks more or less. You're right. There is not a vote about what should be the direction to take yet, but it's unclear how to manage this (at least I don't know what to do in this case when some developers thinks very different). suggestions about what to do are most welcome regards Leonardo Uribe
