Unfortunately, I don't have any knowledge about the ajax work you are
all doing. However, I am -1 on anything that tries to intentionally
break spec compatibility, such as reusing the f: namespace.   Even if
it's not explicitly spelled out, we know that it's against the spirit
of the spec.  I find it impossible to believe that there are not
better approaches.   And the reality is that the actual tags used in
the namespace are under the control of the user anyway.   If someone
wanted to map mfx: as f:, it's trivial to do so in both jsp and in
facelets.   But why would we encourage that behavior?


On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> wrote:
> ok, let's start with t:ajax
>
> We can always add a new JAR, for mfx:ajax...
> But to get this started, I am fine with the following:
>
> 1.) +1
> 2.) +1
> 3.) -0
> 4.) +1 (I will do that some when later)
>
> I think this now we have some kinda agreement, right ?
>
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> 
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Ganesh <gan...@j4fry.org> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The mf:ajax solution is the only one that completely breaks compatibility
>>> with Mojarra. Applications using mf:ajax would simply fails on Mojarra. None
>>
>> not when that is an extra JAR, that is just shipped with the myfaces
>> core release.
>>
>> -M
>>
>>> of solutions [1] to [3] would do so. Alex and me don't have a binding vote,
>>> but it'll be us implementing this and we are both -1 on mf:ajax.
>>>
>>> mf:ajax is also worse than t:ajax because it doesn't bring myfaces
>>> Javascript to Mojarra users. The Mojarra Javascript needs a lot of
>>> improvement...
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Ganesh
>>>>
>>>> -1 b/c that adds an odd dependency to tomahawk...
>>>> mfx:xyz does make sense to be the home for myfaces core "improvements".
>>>>
>>>> -M
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>

Reply via email to