[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-4044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bill Lucy updated MYFACES-4044:
-------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Bill Lucy
Fix Version/s: 2.2.10
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
> Flow ID Ambiguity Is Not Handled Well
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: MYFACES-4044
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-4044
> Project: MyFaces Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 2.2.9
> Reporter: Bill Lucy
> Assignee: Bill Lucy
> Fix For: 2.2.10
>
> Attachments: MYFACES-4044.patch
>
>
> If we have multiple flows with the same IDs and definingDocumentIds, we won't
> behave as expected: only one flow will actually be used, but no error or
> warning to that effect is emitted.
> Consider if we have two apps in the same EAR, each defining flows with an ID
> of "sample-flow", like this:
> final String flowId = "sample-flow";
> flowBuilder.id("", flowId);
> Per the JSF spec, this creates ambiguity:
> 11.4.3.1
> Defining Flows
> Flows are defined using the <flow-definition> element. This element must have
> an id attribute which uniquely
> identifies the flow within the scope of the Application Configuration
> Resource file in which the element appears. To
> enable multiple flows with the same id to exist in an application, the
> <faces-config><name> element is taken to
> be the definingDocumentId of the flow. If no <name> element is specified, the
> empty string is taken as the value
> for definingDocumentId.
> In this case, app1 might define some kind of initializer with the flow, while
> app2 doesn't. In that case, app2 might (incorrectly) end up trying to use an
> initializer that was intended for app1. A developer might see issues
> resulting from the initializer being called from the wrong app, but it
> wouldn't be clear that the wrong flow had been entered (due to ambiguity).
> Mojarra has something like this:
> Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Flow with id \"sample-flow\" and
> definingDocumentId \"\" already exists."}}
> I think that MyFaces should emit some kind of similar warning/error in the
> given scenario.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
