Yes it was me accidentally, and only commits from my side went in (which
also are in master)
Shall I delete the branch or does someone else want to do it.
Btw. sorry that it happened. I did not notice that intellij was pushing the
branch as well.

Werner


Am Do., 21. Juni 2018 um 15:47 Uhr schrieb Eduardo B <ebre...@gmail.com>:

> I haven't started any release process after the move to git. So not sure
> who created that 2.3.x_ branch. I've been committing the MyFaces 2.3
> changes only to master branch.
>
> Regards,
> Eduardo
>
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 9:38 AM, Thomas Andraschko <
> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Could it be related to the last release? @eduardo?
>>
>>
>>
>> 2018-06-21 15:36 GMT+02:00 Dennis Kieselhorst <d...@apache.org>:
>>
>>> I don't know who created 2.3.x_ and for what reason. 2.3.x is currently
>>> on master and that's where we should release the next version.
>>>
>>> Best
>>> Dennis
>>>
>>> On 2018/06/21 13:30:19, "Paul Nicolucci" <p...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > I see we have a master branch on git as well as a "2.3.x_". I've been>
>>> > committing changes for version 2.3.x to the master branch should we
>>> also>
>>> > commit to the 2.3.x_ branch? Just want to ensure I'm doing the correct>
>>> > deliveries.>
>>> >
>>> > I assume we just need to deliver to master for 2.3 changes right now
>>> and>
>>> > then once we start a 2.4 etc we'll catch the 2.3.x branch up to master
>>> and>
>>> > do new forward development in master?>
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,>
>>> >
>>> > Paul Nicolucci>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > From: Dennis Kieselhorst <de...@apache.org>>
>>> > To: <de...@myfaces.apache.org>>
>>> > Date: 05/23/2018 06:20 AM>
>>> > Subject: Re: Migrate all MyFaces projects to Git>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > > AFAICS you merged the 2.3.x into master, right? Shoudln't we remove
>>> the>
>>> > > 2.3.x branch then?>
>>> >
>>> > You are right. I was waiting for other opinions regarding 2.4.x in
>>> master.>
>>> > For now I've removed the 2.3.x branch.>
>>> >
>>> > Regards>
>>> > Dennis>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to