RE: [VOTE] Release of MyFaces Core 3.0.0

Fri, 29 Jan 2021 07:38:37 -0800

Thank you all! Voting has concluded, I'll finish up the release and update the website.
 
Best,
 
Volodymyr
 
----- Original message -----
From: Paul Nicolucci <pnicolu...@gmail.com>
To: MyFaces Development <dev@myfaces.apache.org>
Cc:
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [VOTE] Release of MyFaces Core 3.0.0
Date: Fri, Jan 29, 2021 8:46 AM
 
+1
 
Thanks,
 
Paul Nicolucci
 
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 5:44 PM Volodymyr Siedlecki <volodymyr.siedle...@ibm.com> wrote:
Thank for voting.
 
We have enough votes for a release, but I'll until tomorrow to finalize it..

Best,

Volodymyr
----- Original message -----
From: Bill Lucy <wtl...@gmail.com>
To: MyFaces Development <dev@myfaces.apache.org>
Cc:
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [VOTE] Release of MyFaces Core 3.0.0
Date: Thu, Jan 28, 2021 9:43 AM
 
+1 from me
 
Thanks!
 
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 7:40 AM Bernd Bohmann <bom...@apache.org> wrote:
Here is my +1
 
Regards
 
Bernd
 
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 5:59 PM Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> wrote:
+1
 
Am Mi., 27. Jan. 2021 um 16:48 Uhr schrieb Volodymyr Siedlecki <volodymyr.siedle...@ibm.com>:
Hi,

 
I am again running the needed tasks to release version 3.0.0 of Apache MyFaces core out.

Please note that this vote concerns all of the following parts:
   1. Maven artifact group "org.apache.myfaces.core" v3.0.0  [1]
 
The artifacts were deployed on nexus repository [1] for binary and source packages.
The release notes could be found at [4].
 
The japicmp tool does show some differences. See attached results.
 - I compared the 3.0.0 release to the previous 3.0.0-RC1 and it only showed the corrected @Deprecated annotations.
 - I compared the 3.0.0 release to jakarta-faces.api-3.0.0.jar [5] and it shows some unrelated serialize ID differences.
   Additionally, it showed differences between classes, but this is due to how the jakarta.faces.component.html.* classes are generated in MyFaces. (These differences occurred in the 3.0.0-RC1 release, too) Nothing concerning, in my opinion. 
 
Please take a look at the "3.0.0" artifacts and vote! (see [3])
 
Please note: This vote is "majority approval" with a minimum of three +1 votes (see [2]).
------------------------------------------------
[ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released, and why.
------------------------------------------------
 
Thanks,

Volodymyr Siedlecki

 
 
 
 

Reply via email to