Hey Jim, thanks for putting these together. I am personally a fan of the layout and style of Option 1.
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Jim Klucar <klu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I started in on mocking up the site. I got tired of the bootstrap navbar on > top approach so I came up with a few mock ups. Don't worry about the colors > not being right or whatever details that are off. > > 1) http://imgur.com/Or5Fkbx > 2) http://imgur.com/2ok8T98 > 3) http://imgur.com/al0gGht > > More importantly, I plan on implementing it using Jekyll ( > https://jekyllrb.com/) This is how github pages is done. > https://pages.github.com/ > > Basically Jekyll parses markdown files and injects them into HTML templates > and generates a static site. The main advantage is it is really blog-aware > so we can create new release notices, blog entries, etc by writing a > standalone markdown file and recompiling the site. The other advantage is > we can redesign the website later and all the content won't have to be > ported. Jekyll will just inject the markdown content into the new site > design. > > Let me know what you think. If there aren't any objections to Jekyll I can > get started and we can quibble about design later. > > Jim > -- Brandon
