Thanks Jacopo for looking into this. I haven't had time to jump back in to this old bug, I've been distracted on that other issue(keep finding more problems).

On 06/23/2014 10:20 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
sure, I will.

Thanks,

Jacopo

On Jun 23, 2014, at 4:42 PM, Dékány Dániel <ddek...@freemail.hu> wrote:

That&#39;s fine as far as I&#39;m concerned. (Update from GitHub and rebuild if 
that&#39;s not a problem.) Thanks,  Daniel Dekany
Jacopo Cappellato <jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com> írta:
I can actually commit the new jar and the updated code to run it in the trunk 
in order to simplify the tests from the community. WDYT?

Jacopo

On Jun 23, 2014, at 2:18 PM, Dékány Dániel <ddek...@freemail.hu> wrote:

It would be good if testing the new version goes beyond that single test case, however. Alhough 
the reworked method overloading support has good test coverage, this was a quite complex change 
(it doesn&#39;t just fix the null issue, but many others, like rounding issues). Not to 
mention that turing on the new overloaded method handling is inherently not 100% backward 
compatible (that&#39;s why it&#39;s by default off). Although its much less prone to 
fail with errors, there&#39;s still a little chance that you need to addjust some OfBiz 
code. Thanks,  Daniel Dekany
Jacques Le Roux <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> írta:
Good news, thanks Jacopo!

Jacques

Le 23/06/2014 12:43, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
FYI:

I have been working with Daniel on this and he has helped a lot and I have now 
a working environment; as soon as the new version will be published I will 
update the OFBiz code accordingly.

Jacopo

On Jun 18, 2014, at 11:11 AM, Jacopo Cappellato 
<jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote:

I did the tests but unfortunately they were still not successful.
I have posted a comment to the ticket: let&#39;s see what Daniel has to say.

Jacopo

On Jun 17, 2014, at 10:13 AM, Jacques Le Roux <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> 
wrote:

Hi,

We need to address this https://sourceforge.net/p/freemarker/bugs/363/?page=2

Jacques
PS: @Adam, I put you to be sure you will get a chance to read ;)

--

Reply via email to