Either way seems fine with me. I also can no longer remember the details of that code. It does, howerver, sound relatively high-risk. proceed with caution.
e On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Paul Spencer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > I just took a quick look at this, I can't remember why Erik and I > decided to put it in the Tile base class to begin with but t should be > possible to move the back buffer code into the Tile.Image class. I'll > do this if everyone agrees. > > Paul > > On 30-Jul-08, at 1:27 AM, Eric Lemoine wrote: > > > Hello > > > > For the grid strategy I needed a specialized tile class. What > > logically came to mind was create a child class of OpenLayers.Tile, > > namely OpenLayers.Tile.Vector. Looking at OpenLayers.Tile I discovered > > that OpenLayers.Tile includes back-buffer code that my class wouldn't > > need. For that reason, I implemented my vector tile class without > > inheriting from OpenLayers.Tile, which isn't good as my tile class > > does respect the tile interface. Shouldn't OpenLayers.Tile be as > > abstract as possible? Shoulnd't the backbuffer code be moved to some > > other place? What do you think? > > > > Thanks, > > -- > > Eric > > _______________________________________________ > > Dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/dev > > > __________________________________________ > > Paul Spencer > Chief Technology Officer > DM Solutions Group Inc > http://www.dmsolutions.ca/ > > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/dev >
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
