Top Post:
I wrote to the company—one guy—and politely asked him to abide by Apache's (and 
more particularly AOO's) provisions. I did this via LinkedIn, as a direct email 
to him didn't work. In my note, I cc'd the PMC private list. No news yet!—and I 
wrote him last year, too! :-)

-louis


On 12-12-31, at 14:25 , Louis Suárez-Potts <lui...@gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> On 12-12-31, at 12:05 , Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Louis Suárez-Potts <lui...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 12-12-31, at 11:53 , Rob Weir <rabas...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On Dec 31, 2012, at 7:45 AM, Armin Le Grand <armin_le_gr...@me.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi List,
>>>>> 
>>>>> my wife showed me the following link which leads to the AppStore, to an 
>>>>> AOO ODF format raeder application nicely using the AOO logo, link is
>>>>> 
>>>>> https://itunes.apple.com/de/app/ooreader/id480844649?mt=8
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Interesting. But does anyone recall giving permission to use the logo?
>>>> The way they are using it appears (to me at least) a relationship
>>>> with the AOO project which is unwarranted.
>>>> 
>>> I checked if we'd granted them permission to use OpenOffice.org logo etc 
>>> back in the day but came up with no record of that. (It would be in the 
>>> logos@ openofficedotorg list, a private one but archived, or was, once.) 
>>> BML Solutions is evidently based in Montreal, thus, as the loonie flies, 
>>> not far from me. I can contact them and ask them about this, as well as 
>>> their general work, and ask them to work with us, as we require all to do.
>>> 
>> 
>> Do you get any sense of whether their app involves any AOO code at
>> all?   IMHO, it would be hard to justify giving permission to use the
>> logo if the app involved neither the community nor the code.
> 
> I don't know about the code, haven't checked (busy). I was simply going to 
> ask the developer, and point him to the published principles governing use of 
> the trademark. I can cc this or any list when I do that. 
> 
> louis
> 
> 

Reply via email to