On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Jürgen Schmidt <jogischm...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2/25/13 4:36 PM, Roberto Galoppini wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Jürgen Schmidt <jogischm...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> On 2/21/13 10:05 AM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: >>>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 09:22:34AM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >>>>>>> The first step should be a simple check if an Addons.xcu is >>>>>>> contained at all. Something like "unzip -l <extension> | grep >>>>>>> Addons.xcu" should be enough. The second step if an >>>>>>> Addons.xcu is contained is to check for the "<node >>>>>>> oor:name="OfficeToolBar">" entry. Only if this entry exists >>>>>>> the Addons.xcu the extension has to be updated. >>>> >>>> This might be error prone, because the file can have any name, all >>>> it matters is the media type in the META-INF manifest and the OO >>>> registry package and name in the file itself. >>>> >>>> While it's highly rare to find a lala.lala, I've found an >>>> "addons.xcu" (in lowercase). No wonder there is no OfficeToolBar in >>>> this particular extension, but the extension does not work in AOO >>>> 4.0 due to API changes (what shows that the whole discussion >>>> centered on the schema change is full of ungrounded assumptions, >>>> and lack of knowledge on the subject). >>> >>> ignore case is probably a good idea, a complete different name is >>> probably rather seldom. But from a technical point of view you are >>> correct. >>> >>> We don't need exact data but it would be nice to get an impression how >>> often it is used. > > it would definitely help to get an overview about which extension we are > talking. Based on this info we could contact the owners and can inform > them about the change.
Below the list of Extensions top downloads during the last month: #1 http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/node/3620 Monthly: 1725 #2 http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/node/137 Monthly: 1583 #3 http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/node/4303 Monthly: 1307 #4 http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/node/496 Monthly: 1221 #5 http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/node/415 Monthly: 649 #6 http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/node/4016 Monthly: 645 #7 http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/node/567 Monthly: 424 #8 http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/node/2659 Monthly: 399 #9 http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/node/1719 Monthly: 368 #10 http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/node/5510 Monthly: 330 #11 http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/node/383 Monthly: 328 #12 http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/node/2649 Monthly: 311 #13 http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/node/2355 Monthly: 224 #14 http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/node/3023 Monthly: 218 #15 http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/node/5305 Monthly: 203 #16 http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/node/26 Monthly: 189 #17 http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/node/1210 Monthly: 173 #18 http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/node/3286 Monthly: 167 #19 http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/node/545 Monthly: 163 #20 http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/node/4710 Monthly: 156 #21 http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/node/3902 Monthly: 153 #22 http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/node/5595 Monthly: 152 #23 http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/node/4849 Monthly: 145 #24 http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/node/2771 Monthly: 135 #25 http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/node/4410 Monthly: 135 #26 http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/node/5151 Monthly: 133 #27 http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/node/2169 Monthly: 131 #28 http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/node/283 Monthly: 130 #29 http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/node/3661 Monthly: 122 #30 http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/node/3700 Monthly: 119 #31 http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/node/4213 Monthly: 117 #32 http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/node/4658 Monthly: 117 #33 http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/node/2201 Monthly: 111 #34 http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/node/1798 Monthly: 89 #35 http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/node/5392 Monthly: 88 #36 http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/node/5317 Monthly: 87 #37 http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/node/847 Monthly: 83 #38 http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/node/1039 Monthly: 80 #39 http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/node/207 Monthly: 76 #40 http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/node/4739 Monthly: 65 #41 http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/node/640 Monthly: 64 #42 http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/node/1864 Monthly: 61 #43 http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/node/3909 Monthly: 60 #44 http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/node/4150 Monthly: 54 #45 http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/node/4798 Monthly: 54 #46 http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/node/2085 Monthly: 50 #47 http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/node/603 Monthly: 49 #48 http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/node/4979 Monthly: 48 #49 http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/node/4361 Monthly: 45 #50 http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/node/3409 Monthly: 42 Roberto > Juergen > > >>> >>> Juergen >>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>> 242 extensions contain addons.xcu stensioni (total: 1065 >>>>>> releases), 430 estensions don't (total: 1660 releases). Do you >>>>>> want us to check how many contain OfficeToolBar? >>>>> >>>>> If you could run a short script to check it, it would be very >>>>> useful for us to make a final decision. >> >> Officetoolbar used within 137 extensions (553 releases). >> >>>>> >>>>> Maybe you can also provide some numbers about their downloads. >>>>> Only th extensions that contain an Addons.xcu with OfficeToolBar >> >> That's not really trivial, but it would be easier to figure out how >> many among top 50 contain Addons.xcu with OfficeToolBar. >> >> Would it make the trick? If not I'll work on how to compute those numbers. >> >> Let me know, >> >> Roberto >> >> >>>> It would also be interesting to know the last time the extension >>>> was updated; besides that expecting unmaintained extensions to work >>>> on a new major release might not be plausible, the extension is >>>> likely not be adapted to any change if it is unmaintained, no >>>> matter how popular it is (example: the most popular, Oracle PDF >>>> Import Extension, Downloads: Week: 12,706, unmaintained since Dec. >>>> 2010, seems to be broken - according to the first three comments). >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards -- ==== This e- mail message is intended only for the named recipient(s) above. It may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail and any attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and delete the message and any attachment(s) from your system. Thank you. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
