On 3/10/13 8:50 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Juergen Schmidt wrote: >> Am Sonntag, 10. März 2013 um 00:39 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: >>> Seeing the many recent discussions about infrastructure (wiki, forum, >>> buildbots, Pootle, domains, certificates...) I believe we should use the >>> report to make a sort of "Infrastructure wishlist". ... >> how about the suggestion to buy a code signing certificate > > Good idea. Let's really try to make a simple list of "What" and "Why". > This should be considered as a wishlist and not a list of actions we > demand: we tell the Board what could help in making our project more > efficient (and we will likely ask Infra to comment on the list before we > send it); the Board, while allocating resources, can use these > suggestions (discussions about what budget to use may or may not be > relevant, but a list of priorities would be fine for the time being). > > So: > > What: Buy a code signing certificate > Why [please check!]: This would allow the project to digitally sign the > convenience binaries it ships, and avoid Windows and Mac OS X warnings > about unsigned installers.
The MacOSX part is not yet finally evaluated but we need either a valid certificate and/or a Apple developer ID. The process itself has to be evaluated. > > What: Acquire a *.openoffice.org certificate > Why: This would allow to avoid false alarms when enforcing HTTPS to > browse OpenOffice sites, and give the possibility of secure login to > wiki.openoffice.org and forum.openoffice.org > > What: Allocate budget for additional domains > Why: This would help in transferring legacy domains to Apache, see > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4906 > > What: Officially support MWiki [remember this is a wishlist!] > Why: wiki.openoffice.org is an important service to our users, with over > 15K [right?] pages and many [how many?] users. And we don't want to put > an additional burden on Infra without getting additional resources for it. > > What: Officially support phpBB > Why: forum.openoffice.org is an important service to our users, with > [numbers?]. And we don't want to put an additional burden on Infra > without getting additional resources for it. > > Anything else? Buildbots, Pootle? Pootle: the hardware should be sufficient to work with the server and we should have enough disk space for ~ 3 OpenOffice related projects. I am thinking here about stable long term product lines that potentially get more translations later or important fixes or changes. Juergen > > Regards, > Andrea. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
