Le 26/07/2013 01:50, Peter Junge a écrit :
On 7/26/2013 12:18 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Pavel Janík <pa...@janik.cz> wrote:
Rob,
On Jul 25, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
This is the advantage of writing innovative code, not just copying it.
can you please stop writing such stupid sentences? Notice that I do not talk at
all about the particular license issue.
I'm not talking about license issues either. I'm just saying that if
you are the originator of a feature then you get press coverage twice:
the 1st time when you initially release it and then a 2nd time when
another project copies it. We're seeing that now.
A specific example, Ars Technica, on the LO 4.1 release:
http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/07/libreoffice-4-1-is-released-borrows-new-sidebar-from-openoffice/
Your comment there doesn't help anyone.
This discussion is not for helping anyone.
Since we thought that all the developers had switched to LibreOffice, we are
pleased to see that there are some left who even fix LibO bugs and implement
new features.
:-)
For the record, I'm aggregating the links here:
http://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=63026
Hagar
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
