On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Andrea Pescetti <pesce...@apache.org>wrote:
> On 25/09/2013 Rob Weir wrote: > >> http://www.pcworld.com/**article/2048446/apache-** >> openoffice-4-0-review-new-**features-easier-to-use-still-**free.html<http://www.pcworld.com/article/2048446/apache-openoffice-4-0-review-new-features-easier-to-use-still-free.html> >> Title is "Apache OpenOffice 4.0 review: New features, easier to use, >> still free" >> > > Nice review, even though one of the initial sentences > --- > Like LibreOffice and OpenOffice.org, Apache OpenOffice "forked" from > Oracle OpenOffice (which grew from StarOffice) in 2010. > --- > it's so dense of errors that makes me wonder where people get information > from (to avoid confusion: the sentence contains several errors, but the > most disturbing one is that it portrays OpenOffice.org as a fork of Oracle > OpenOffice). > > Regards, > Andrea. > > > ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.org<dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > I read that, and tweet the publishing unfortunately they dont list the author so no way to get an update. Also they quote the fokrked so maybe he was just being lazy explaining the whole deal. I did point him to the Apache announcement on OpenOffice.org back in 2010. -- Alexandro Colorado Apache OpenOffice Contributor http://www.openoffice.org 882C 4389 3C27 E8DF 41B9 5C4C 1DB7 9D1C 7F4C 2614
