Sounds good. Thanks for your work.
I don't know if the last 1-2 paragraphs are still not "Apache-friendly"
enough. Maybe it's better to avoid to state explicitely the anmes (and
abbreviations). Of course, here others can judge better. ;-)
Marcus
Am 02/23/2015 01:15 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
On 02/02/2015 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
I'll propose a rewrite
And here we are. It is not the way I would have written it, but it seems
a reasonable way to fulfill what I believe to be part of the OpenOffice
mission (whatever people think): educating users to basic concepts about
free, open source software and licenses.
This is the proposed new version of
http://www.openoffice.org/why/why_compliance.html
meant to will preserve SEO value and informative value, but (hopefully)
in a more neutral tone.
Wordings and minor mistakes can always be improved; what I'd like to
know is if this version can be OK in general. We won't necessarily end
with an agreement of course, but it still believe it's worth a try,
since we can't give up part of the de-facto OpenOffice mission.
---
[...]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
