Am 15.09.2018 um 20:25 schrieb Peter kovacs:
> I do not have those rights. Probably because my bugzilla user is an account. 
> I tried to switch to my apache address but I failed.
> The account name is an leginee account at Google mail service.

Your account must be added to the appropriate groups. See:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/How+to+Cook+a+Release

I don't have the rights, so someone else has to do it.

Regards,
   Matthias

>
> Am 15. September 2018 10:34:31 MESZ schrieb Matthias Seidel 
> <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de>:
>> Am 15.09.2018 um 10:07 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>> Am 15.09.2018 um 07:47 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>>>> Okay for granting I switch from '?' to none?
>>> No, you change to "+" if you think this should be in 4.1.6.
>>> And you change to "-" if you think it shouldn't.
>>>
>>> At least this is my understanding...
>> That said, can someone please ensure that Peter is in the group
>> "relman"
>> in our Bugzilla?!
>>
>> I would have a look myself but as I wrote several times before I don't
>> have sufficient rights...
>>
>> Matthias
>>
>>> Regards,
>>>    Matthias
>>>
>>>> On 9/14/18 7:37 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>> Hi Peter,
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 09.09.2018 um 18:03 schrieb Peter Kovacs:
>>>>>> Okay I had a look now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have a bit of an issue in filtering on the blocker flag.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I filtered now on the Version 4.1.6-dev and 4.1.6 and found 6
>> reports.
>>>>>> Are these all of them?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - The Patch I had in mind i did not find again. Next time I have
>> to
>>>>>> note the issue number. :(
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thus I am fine with the Blockers so far. Anything that anyone
>> wants
>>>>>> still to add from the dev list?
>>>>> There are more to come... ;-)
>>>>> If you are OK with a blocker, just grant it, so we can move
>> forward.
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>     Matthias
>>>>>
>>>>>> All the best
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 9/6/18 5:10 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote:
>>>>>>>    I plan to have a look on the weekend, what we have now. I want
>> to
>>>>>>> add one patch concerning mailmerge.
>>>>>>> And then off we go, I Think.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I agree with Jim in general. I see a possibility that the 4.1.x
>>>>>>> series gets maintenance till 2020, for centOS6 while every one
>> else
>>>>>>> is moving to 4.2.0.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 6. September 2018 15:25:19 MESZ schrieb Jim Jagielski
>>>>>>> <j...@jagunet.com>:
>>>>>>>> Anyone can propose something as a blocker... it's up to the RM
>> on
>>>>>>>> whether it really is one or not ;)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> BTW: I'm ready to go w/ Linux and macOS builds!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sep 6, 2018, at 8:05 AM, Matthias Seidel
>>>>>>>> <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi Jim,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Am 03.09.2018 um 23:45 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>>>>>>>>> For some users, AOO 4.1.6 will be the "last" version of OO
>> that
>>>>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>>> can use, since AOO 4.2.x will not provide some community build
>> for
>>>>>>>> older platforms (eg: CentOS5,...). As such, I think we need to
>> make
>>>>>>>> 4.1.6 as good and as stable and as useful, with as many patches
>> and
>>>>>>>> fixes, as feasible for those users.
>>>>>>>>> Definitely!
>>>>>>>>> We already have some release blocker asked for.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> How to proceed?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>      Matthias
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 3, 2018, at 4:49 PM, Matthias Seidel
>>>>>>>> <matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Andrea,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Am 03.09.2018 um 22:37 schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> How about this one:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126736
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It fixes a typo in the build process.
>>>>>>>>>>>> This one has zero impact for users and, if 4.1.6 was just a
>>>>>>>>>>>> maintenance release and we had regular 4.x major releases,
>> it
>>>>>>>> wouldn't
>>>>>>>>>>>> make sense to include fixes like this one. Still, it is
>> zero-risk
>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>> (unfortunately) 4.2.0 is taking longer than expected, so I
>>>>>>>> understand
>>>>>>>>>>>> if we try to backport some fixes to 4.1.6. No objection.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> In general, release blockers should be:
>>>>>>>>>>>> - important bugfixes for users
>>>>>>>>>>>> - important build fixes (e.g., don't break with a new
>> compiler)
>>>>>>>>>>>> - important infrastructure fixes (e.g., support newer JRE,
>> or a
>>>>>>>> newer
>>>>>>>>>>>> Windows release... just an example)
>>>>>>>>>>> This is why I didn't ask for release blocker. ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It is just "nice to have" and another resolved issue that
>> would
>>>>>>>> finally
>>>>>>>>>>> find its way into a release.
>>>>>>>>>>> There are a lot of them, that do not qualify as "blocker"...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>     Matthias
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>    Andrea.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>>> <mailto:dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>>> <mailto:dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org>
>>>>>>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to