Andrea, I am just saying a 4.1.7 release has nothing to do with the efforts we have to organize for 4.2.0.
I hope I upload now into the right place, but I have initiated the task. All the best Peter On 13.11.18 00:48, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Peter Kovacs wrote: >> I do not see your issue. Our release team works much faster then the dev >> team progresses on 4.2.0. > > There is a major difference between a 4.1.x and a new release like > 4.2.0: for 4.2.0 we need the entire community, not only what you call > the "release team" and developers (read: localization efforts, > organized QA efforts, a possible public beta, a baseline update...). > If you believe that 4.2.0 is only for developers you are > underestimating the task. > >> A 4.1.7 will keep the routine and knowledge active while we develop >> 4.2.0. > > We have many millions of users. We must provide some value with a > release. This meant waiting 11 months (and counting) between 4.1.5 and > 4.1.6; if 4.1.6 has no major regressions, we can surely wait some > months before considering a 4.1.7 (again, in a non-emergency situation). > > But I would really like that we stop talking about this virtual 4.1.7 > release and actually release 4.1.6 for real. > > Regards, > Andrea. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
