astitcher commented on PR #421:
URL: https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton/pull/421#issuecomment-1981610822

   There is a clear thread safety violation in  ```run_timer_jobs`` use of  
```is_active_``` without using the appropriate lock - in fact this is so 
obvious that I'm puzzled we haven't seen it in the TSAN or even static analyzer 
runs - maybe we just missed it!
   Unfortunately this fix has changed the previous semantics of task 
cancellation: An important way to cancel a task is from a previous task 
callback. However this change makes that unreliable as it only checks for task 
cancellation before executing the entire batch of tasks that are runable at the 
point where ```run_timer_jobs``` is called. So if an earlier task in the batch 
cancels a later task in the batch then that cancellation would not be honored.
   I'm looking at a fix that should work correctly now and I'll post it here 
when I'm done.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@qpid.apache.org

Reply via email to