Two hours ago, Robby Findler wrote: > On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 5:18 AM, Eli Barzilay <e...@barzilay.org> wrote: > > > > The problem here is that there is no name to change -- it's the > > implicit "coercion" of xexpr values to a response. > > Why can't there be two libraries, one that coerces and one that > doesn't? More generally, one that acts the same as the current > library and one that is intended for new code?
That would require a new `web-server' module, as well as a whole bunch of other modules. Even worse, writing a module using one web server library, and using it in the other won't work, since it's a dynamic property of how the result is getting used. -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev