No not all points of pr 9692 have been addressed, but after using the search & replace API for some time I got used to it and now I am happy with it as it is. I use check syntax for looking up and replacing complete identifiers. Thanks, Jos
> -----Original Message----- > From: robby.find...@gmail.com > [mailto:robby.find...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Robby Findler > Sent: 16 February 2011 22:30 > To: Jos Koot > Cc: PLT Developers > Subject: Re: [racket-dev] irrelevant open problem reports > > Thanks! > > I went back over these and closed all of them except 9692. Are you > happy with the search & replace API overall? I' not sure that all of > those points have been addresssed. > > Robby > > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Jos Koot > <jos.k...@telefonica.net> wrote: > > A problem report query with originator "Jos Koot" shows 10 > open PRs. As far > > as I can judge, all off them are already fixed or otherwise > answered in a > > satisfying way. As far as I am concerned, they can be closed. > > Now I am enjoying 5.0.1.2. > > Thanks to the whole PLT !!! > > Jos Koot > > > > > > _________________________________________________ > > For list-related administrative tasks: > > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev > > _________________________________________________ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev