++1 Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 20, 2012, at 4:36 PM, Carl Eastlund <c...@ccs.neu.edu> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Vincent St-Amour <stamo...@ccs.neu.edu> > wrote: >> At Fri, 20 Jul 2012 16:17:22 -0400, >> as...@racket-lang.org wrote: >>> 3582b57 Asumu Takikawa <as...@racket-lang.org> 2012-07-20 15:10 >>> : >>> | Move mzlib/defmacro => racket/defmacro >> >> I'm not sure this belongs in `racket'. This is not a Racket feature. >> It's closer to a CL compatibility library. >> >> How about having a `compatibility' collect, which would include this and >> things like `racket/package' (compatibility with Chez) and `racket/mpair' >> (compatibility with Scheme)? It would be harder to confuse these things >> with blessed Racket features. >> >> Vincent > > +1 > > For backwards (ahem) compatibility, we would have to maintain the > racket/package and racket/mpair names as aliases, but changing > existing uses of them to the new name and making the racket/ > documentation point to compatibility/ would help make the point. > > --Carl > _________________________ > Racket Developers list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev _________________________ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev