This seemed okay, but just a quick read of the code. But did I miss
the test cases? (I just followed the link upthread -- sorry if I need
to look somewhere else too.)
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Alexis King <lexi.lam...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Any update on this? If there’s anything that still needs to be changed, let
> me know—otherwise, I’ll patiently wait for the process to run its course.
> Just checking in.
>> On Jan 16, 2015, at 10:15, Alexis King <lexi.lam...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Ah, that makes sense, fixed.
>>> On Jan 16, 2015, at 05:37, Robby Findler <ro...@eecs.northwestern.edu>
>>> One comment. The contract combinators are curried so that you can do
>>> work on the partial applications. So don't write this:
>>> (define ((((ho-val-first-projection
>>> impersonate/chaperone-async-channel) ctc) blame) val)
>>> instead try to do some work earlier, when you first can. (The most
>>> important thing is to minimize the work done after you get the 'val'
> Racket Developers list:
Racket Developers list: