I'm considering an option that Craig mentioned earlier - moving this to google's new open source area. While I understand the reasons for the tight restrictions that ASF has, it makes it difficult to host a fully functional sample app using several different technologies.
On google (and presumably dev.java.net), we can also distribute binaries wither hibernate, etc. That will allow more people to use the app. No matter how easy you make it, some people are just putoff by compiling their own source. I admit, sometimes I fall into this category (if my interest is only casual.) If we do move it, I'd still like some loose integration between shale and this project. This would include links to the shale-petstore from the shale site and referring people on the user list to the shale-petstore when it serves as an appropriate example. Thoughts? Sean On 8/3/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/3/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 8/3/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Most of the images seem to be: GNU Free Documentation License, Version > > 1.2. What about the text? Any ideas on that? > > Are you asking about the text on Wikipedia? There's a notice at the > bottom of every page: "All text is available under the terms of the > GNU Free Documentation License." > > As for whether we can use the text or images, if GFDL is not listed on > Cliff's page [1] then I would ask on [EMAIL PROTECTED] I suspect the GNU license for docs will have issues, so asking on legal-discuss would be a good idea. In the mean time, note that the original Blueprints PetStore application (including content and images) is BSD-licensed, so we can use stuff from there. <https://blueprints.dev.java.net>) Craig [1] http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/3party.html > > -- > Wendy >
