>From: Bernhard Slominski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Hi all, > > I guess it makes sense, to make the merger a post JSF 2 project. > So all features, which are included in JSF 2 (e.g Remoting) should not move, > but just stay in Shale. > Also let's see where templating and component development goes before making > a decision about Clay. > So Shale is then the JSF 1.X add-on framework, when it comes to JSF 2 all > Add-Ons move to MyFaces. >
Well, that is fine with me but realistically, we would be talking about next summer then. > Bernhard > Gary > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag > > von Craig > > McClanahan > > Gesendet: Montag, 22. Oktober 2007 01:48 > > An: MyFaces Development; Shale Developers List > > Betreff: Re: Merging Shale into MyFaces > > > > > > > > > > > * Remoting > > > > Unsure, as most of this can be done with PPR too. > > > > > > +1 This is pretty useful and easy to use, and will affect JSF 2.0. > > > > A secondary benefit is near-zero config for resource access, > > particularly for resources provided in a jar file instead of as > > exploded files in a WAR. Until JSF 2 comes along, that's pretty > > useful all by itself. > > > > > > Craig > >
