On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Torsten Krah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I want to fix this bug 442 and want to ask some question here about doing > that, if thats ok, i'll hope so.
This is definitely the right place to discuss such fixes. > > I'll fixed the decorator not to apply shales validator renderer if the > renderer family matches the ajax stuff, which let them work again. > However this seams not the ultimate approach to me because there are so many > different familys and renderers which should not be decorated, that i'll have > to code everytime they change. At first glance, I don't think it's a good idea to hardcode a set of renderer families that will not apply like that. The root of the problem is that you can't have both the validator and ajax renderers and the combination is a valid one. So it seems like we need to rethink (maybe) the way we handle the validator renderers. Right now I don't have a better answer for you. Greg
