Hi, Agreed with cancelling the vote with respect to the installer parts and continuing for the testing parts.
As for repository.a.o: I think you have to drop the entire staging and then upload again. But since the vote has already passed (and trusting you to "do the right thing") I would then assume the staging repository may immediately be released, maybe with a comment indicating the successful vote for this (such that we have it in the commit list archive). Regards Felix Am 17.09.2010 10:03, schrieb Carsten Ziegeler: > Felix Meschberger wrote >> +1 >> >> What sounds a bit odd, though, is the bundle symbolic names: >> >> org.apache.sling.jcr.jcrinstall >> org.apache.sling.osgi.installer >> org.apache.sling.install.fileinstall >> >> Sounds like they have something in common, but not really much ... >> >> Wouldn't it make sense to have some concise naming convention for this ? >> >> For example >> >> org.apache.sling.install.core (today: ...osgi.installer) >> org.apache.sling.install.provider.jcr (today: ...jcr.jcrinstall) >> org.apache.sling.install.provider.file (today: ...install.fileinstall) >> > Hmm, yes I agree the symbolic names are a little mess :) > > Ok, the first question is: should we stop the vote? Once this is > published it gets harder to change it. > So, given that we have no release for several years of this stuff, it > doesn't matter if it takes one or two weeks longer. I would suggest that > we continue the vote for the testing bundle but stop for the installer > stuff (not sure if it is possible to just promote a part of the staging > repo) > > I would also like that the package names have something do to with the > symbolic name. > > WDYT? > Carsten >
