[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-10760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Karl Pauls updated SLING-10760: ------------------------------- Fix Version/s: Content-Package to Feature Model Converter 1.1.14 (was: Content-Package to Feature Model Converter 1.1.12) > Converter ignores access control content and users/groups in .content.xml > files > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: SLING-10760 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-10760 > Project: Sling > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Content-Package to Feature Model Converter > Reporter: Angela Schreiber > Priority: Critical > Fix For: Content-Package to Feature Model Converter 1.1.14 > > Attachments: subtree_in_contentxml_policy.png, > subtree_in_contentxml_sibling.png > > > [~kpauls], while trying to find more edge cases that could cause SLING-10754, > i noticed that not only sibling nodes but also access control content (like > e.g. _rep:policy_ nodes) contained in a _.content.xml_ get installed by > Jackrabbit Filevault even if those nodes are not covered by the corresponding > {{WorkspaceFilter}}. > It also seems that these package 'entries' are not spotted by the converter > and thus the dedicated {{EntryHandler}} implementations that are intended to > analyze and convert special content like e.g. access control (but probably > not limited to that) are not triggered. > In other words: content hidden in _.content.xml_ will not be properly > converted but will be installed even if not covered by _filter.xml_ > associated with the content package. I don't know if that actually intended > behavior of Jackrabbit FileVault (the documentation clearly stating that > everything should be covered by filter rules [0], section 'Usage for > Import/Installation'), but if it is correct it might in the worse case > require the converter to parse all _.content.xml_ files and delegate to the > proper handler implementations. > [~kwin], I would appreciate your input on the FileVault related question of > this ticket. In particular: is it correct and intended that subnodes defined > in _.content.xml_ get installed even if not covered by any filter rule? > [0] https://jackrabbit.apache.org/filevault/filter.html -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.1#820001)