[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16468980#comment-16468980
 ] 

Oliver Lietz commented on SLING-7659:
-------------------------------------

[~kwin], not cleaning {{target}} leads to non-reproducible builds. This is not 
a test framework issue. Our older launchpad builds not using Testing PaxExam 
are also affected.

But as I said, we can easily add a random string to {{workingDirectory}} and 
are done. 

> Test using o.a.s.testing.paxexam block if run without "mvn clean"
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SLING-7659
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7659
>             Project: Sling
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Testing
>    Affects Versions: Testing PaxExam 2.0.0
>            Reporter: Bertrand Delacretaz
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: testing.log
>
>
> This happens for (at least) the following modules:
>  * sling-org-apache-sling-commons-html which uses o.a.s.testing.paxexam 2.0.0
>  * sling-org-apache-sling-resource-presence which uses o.a.s.testing.paxexam 
> 0.0.4
> The integration tests work fine with {{mvn clean install}} but running {{mvn 
> install}} right after that causes the tests to hang and time out (after 
> approximately 6 minutes).
> Deleting {{target/paxexam}} folder before running {{mvn install}} fixes the 
> issue, so it's linked to existing OSGi state apparently.
> I'll attach a {{testing.log}}, I don't see any obvious clues in it but the 
> tests block after this line:
> {code:java}
> 2018-05-09 11:59:56,003 DEBUG [BundleWatcher: 1] o.o.p.e.r.e.i.Probe 
> [Parser.java : 64] Registering Service: org.ops4j.pax.exam.ProbeInvoker 
> with Probe-Signature="PaxExam-d4e46627-3b02-462a-aa46-883ce54e3f9f" 
> and expression=
> "org.apache.sling.commons.html.it.TagsoupHtmlParserIT;testFeaturesConfiguration"
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to