[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17018079#comment-17018079
 ] 

Jason E Bailey commented on SLING-7760:
---------------------------------------

This depends on why the response headers are set where they are currently set.

My initial attempt at this would be to to remove the setting of the headers 
from the initialization of SlingHttpServletResponseImpl and create a new method 
in RequestData called initHeaders(ResourceResolver) which I would call after 
calling initResource in the doProcessRequest step of SlingRequestProcessorImpl

I haven't worked with CA Configurations before so this is an educated guess.

 

> Sling Main Servlet - Change header configuration to a service
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SLING-7760
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-7760
>             Project: Sling
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Jason E Bailey
>            Assignee: Jason E Bailey
>            Priority: Major
>
> The ability to set headers must be done prior to any writing that occurs the 
> output stream. This is the reason why the headers are set to be configured in 
> the Sling Main Servlet.
> With Sling being used to maintain multiple sites, having a single set of 
> response headers creates problems where the header provides a non tailored 
> response. One site may have a conflicting set of requirements then another 
> site.
> If the setting of headers was moved from being a configuration to being a 
> service used by the Main Servlet, this would allow the following:
>  * Headers set on a per site basis
>  * Headers based on selected resource
>  * Ability to modify the headers without causing the restart of the Sling 
> Main Servlet
>  ** Which if you're dealing with CSP headers can be a constant pain
>  * Ability to create a CSP configuration Service that eases the use of CSP 
> creation
>  
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to