http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3703
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-30 14:50 ------- Subject: Re: clean up debugging -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Daniel Quinlan writes: > Do we want to require debug facilities to be registered? (A primary list > in SpamAssassin.pm plus a registration function for plugins.) > > Pros: keeps things cleaner and more organized > allows users to list current facilities > Cons: minor pain > > By "require", I mean that we'd warn() or dbg() for unknown facilities. I'm not keen on it; I think it'd be overkill. BTW regarding the number of facilities -- in my opinion if a message is output not too frequently, and/or is only output by 1 or 2 dbg() statements, a "misc" facility would do fine. Having too many facilities is one factor of what makes sendmail's debugging a nightmare to use. - --j. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQFBXH+EQTcbUG5Y7woRAsJFAJ9OGUhJ9NqSp4pakz4uEzfh7lLCrgCgvU24 pFs6I2MbhEvhg5OTVsylEh0= =ZGBX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
