1) Dude that is one hell of a cool domain name for a non pron site! Cool!! 2) quasirhombicosidodecahedron.com also rocks as a domain name! 3) Your original complaint, doesn't exhist :)
You are NOT listed. Something is up. We have seen these more then a few times. hotnudiegirls.com is not listed in ANY SURBL. www.rulesemporium.com/cgi-bin/uribl.cgi to check it out. I have no idea if it is corrupt cache data, or some sort of goofyness in the SA code. Is it possible we have a FUBAR SURBL mirror? I've cc'd just about anyone having any clue to help. This is about the 4th report in 3 days. --Chris >-----Original Message----- >From: Samat Jain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 2:23 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: hotnudiegirls.com URI as false positive > > >Hello, > >When sending an e-mail to myself, I apparently got my message >tagged as spam >with SpamAssassin: > > 3.9 URIBL_SC_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the SC >SURBL blocklist > [URIs: hotnudiegirls.com] > 2.0 URIBL_OB_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the OB >SURBL blocklist > [URIs: hotnudiegirls.com] > >These were picking up my website (whose tagline I've removed >from this e-mail) >URL that is in the signature of all my e-mail messages. > >My domain is not an origin of spam, nor has it ever, or any source of >questionable material. It is a personal domain used only for >hosting some >services and ONE website that I keep on the signature portion >of my e-mails. > >Thank you, >Samat > >-- >Samat Jain > >Flap's Law: Any inanimate object, regardless of its position, >configuration, >or purpose, may be expected to perform at any time in a >totally unexpected >manner for reasons that are either entirely obscure or else completely >mysterious. >-- Anonymous (586) >