On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 10:31:58PM -0800, Daniel Quinlan wrote: > Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Yeah, that mostly sums up my feelings. The current RBL information tells > > us when a positive lookup occurs, but not when a negative lookup occurs. > > True, you have to assume a negative lookup if it doesn't show and the > "reuse" mapping indicates it was present. I'll provide a way for people > to disable reuse for rules that they normally don't run with.
This sounds really, really error prone. I'm sure there's a better way :-( -- Duncan Findlay
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
