Warren Togami wrote:
> Why bother pushing another tarball just for a single patch that
> affects only one distribution?

If I understand the preceding discussion correctly this is not a matter of
"release early, release often" carried to an extreme. It is an abort of the
release process for 3.0.3 after the version number has been frozen into a
tarball but before it has been announced. The idea is to abort the release
in order to accommodate another patch that would have gone into 3.0.3 if
there had been a 24 hour waiting period for final votes to be collected.

Michael, is that a correct assessment of the situation?

 -- sidney

Reply via email to