-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
strchr() should be fine -- I haven't seen a system that didn't support it, either. Regarding autoheader et al -- I have no idea why it wants to get rid of HAVE_LIBSSL, but iirc autoscan is destructive, and only suitable as a "first try" which you're supposed to spend some time hand-editing afterwards, so I wouldn't say the removal of that holds too much water. - --j. Malte S. Stretz writes: > Moin, > > I just remembered that I used strchr(3) in my last commit to spamc and > according to the man page is that one part of C99, so might be missing on > some system (?). > > I wondered what autofoo might say about it and got this: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/projects/current/spamassassin/3.1.clean/spamc $ autoscan > configure.in: warning: missing AC_CHECK_FUNCS([alarm]) wanted by: utils.c:79 > configure.in: warning: missing AC_CHECK_FUNCS([dup2]) wanted by: spamc.c:513 > configure.in: warning: missing AC_CHECK_FUNCS([gethostbyname]) wanted by: > libspamc.c:1493 > configure.in: warning: missing AC_CHECK_FUNCS([inet_ntoa]) wanted by: > libspamc.c:360 > configure.in: warning: missing AC_CHECK_FUNCS([memset]) wanted by: > libspamc.c:303 > configure.in: warning: missing AC_CHECK_FUNCS([strcasecmp]) wanted by: > libspamc.c:805 > configure.in: warning: missing AC_CHECK_FUNCS([strchr]) wanted by: > libspamc.c:1488 > configure.in: warning: missing AC_CHECK_FUNCS([strerror]) wanted by: > libspamc.c:211 > configure.in: warning: missing AC_CHECK_FUNCS([strstr]) wanted by: > libspamc.c:828 > configure.in: warning: missing AC_CHECK_HEADERS([arpa/inet.h]) wanted by: > libspamc.c:40 > configure.in: warning: missing AC_CHECK_HEADERS([fcntl.h]) wanted by: > spamc.c:30 > configure.in: warning: missing AC_FUNC_FORK wanted by: qmail-spamc.c:87 > configure.in: warning: missing AC_FUNC_MALLOC wanted by: libspamc.c:465 > configure.in: warning: missing AC_TYPE_SIGNAL wanted by: spamc.c:625 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/projects/current/spamassassin/3.1.clean/spamc $ autoheader > autoheader-2.59: WARNING: Using auxiliary files such as `acconfig.h', > `config.h.bot' > autoheader-2.59: WARNING: and `config.h.top', to define templates for > `config.h.in' > autoheader-2.59: WARNING: is deprecated and discouraged. > autoheader-2.59: > autoheader-2.59: WARNING: Using the third argument of `AC_DEFINE' and > autoheader-2.59: WARNING: `AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED' allows to define a template > without > autoheader-2.59: WARNING: `acconfig.h': > autoheader-2.59: > autoheader-2.59: WARNING: AC_DEFINE([NEED_FUNC_MAIN], 1, > autoheader-2.59: [Define if a function `main' is needed.]) > autoheader-2.59: > autoheader-2.59: WARNING: More sophisticated templates can also be produced, > see the > autoheader-2.59: WARNING: documentation. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/projects/current/spamassassin/3.1.clean/spamc $ svn diff > config.h.in > Index: config.h.in > ==================================================================--- > config.h.in (revision 202147) > +++ config.h.in (working copy) > @@ -25,9 +25,6 @@ > /* Define to 1 if you have the <inttypes.h> header file. */ > #undef HAVE_INTTYPES_H > > -/* Define to 1 if you have the `crypto' library (-lcrypto). */ > -#undef HAVE_LIBCRYPTO > - > /* Define to 1 if you have the `dl' library (-ldl). */ > #undef HAVE_LIBDL > > @@ -40,9 +37,6 @@ > /* Define to 1 if you have the `socket' library (-lsocket). */ > #undef HAVE_LIBSOCKET > > -/* Define to 1 if you have the `ssl' library (-lssl). */ > -#undef HAVE_LIBSSL > - > /* Define to 1 if you have the <memory.h> header file. */ > #undef HAVE_MEMORY_H > > Do we care about the missing checks? Why does autoheader want to remove the > SSL/crypto defines? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQFCwilnMJF5cimLx9ARAqKgAJsFpiLHV5JtFQ1bbgrE3jT8yGfRQgCghuKV VVnGlLLQ0Mrm6YkbLg5dHq8= =HaRf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
