-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Theo Van Dinter writes: >On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 11:53:08AM -0800, Justin Mason wrote: >> There's no guarantee that sandbox code will be of a distributable quality, >> yet. As a result we should not distribute .pm's from the sandbox dir, and >> only distribute .pm's from "rules" or "rulesrc/core". Neither .pm should >> be listed in MANIFEST, accordingly. > >Sure. I don't mind not putting pm's in distribution (the code ought >to move to the Plugin directory (or EvalTests if we don't actually get >rid of it)), but we need to have them actually copied and used during >development. So there's really two issues that I'm seeing at the moment: > >1) right now we need to put the sandbox pm files in MANIFEST or else during > the nightly runs, mkrules won't copy them over to the rules/ directory > thereby not letting us test sandboxed eval rules. ah, yes. mkrules won't copy .pm's unless they are in the MANIFEST. >2) the loadplugin line gets generated in the cf files after the rules > that need it loaded, so the ifplugin requirement fails, and the rules > aren't actually run. And this should be easily fixable ;) You're right, both are bugs; any chance of a bugzilla entry and I'll try to get them fixed RSN? - --j. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh CVS iD8DBQFD54n8MJF5cimLx9ARAhN6AKCRaYvSjWeQ0Y9Rn2QrBLOuXEWMFgCcC629 xVcgC6Xawjdz6E0qQpuEI6s= =+754 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
