Kenneth Porter writes: > On Wednesday, March 01, 2006 12:00 PM +0000 Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > I can understand that it may be tricky to implicitly perform the "svn > > update -r" on the external, too, since that may be coming from a > > different repository. > > Did you raise this on one of the Subversion mailing lists?
yep, yesterday on [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Perhaps the external property takes a versioned URI? In which case you'd > need to update the property if you wanted the property to track the parent > directory's version and not stay anchored to the tip. no, it's not a versioned URI -- just a normal repository-path URI. it appears to be a design decision not to propagate "-r" requests to externals (probably since there's no guarantee that an external is in the same revision-space, ie. repository.) --j.
