Michael Monnerie writes:
> On Mittwoch, 5. April 2006 19:22 Justin Mason wrote:
> > (For what it's worth, 0830 UTC was chosen as an hour that's not
> > during working hours for most of the committers; 0000 UTC isn't good
> > on that count, since it's 1600 PST.)
> 
> I don't understand why my results made a problem then - process start 
> was 0303 and ended around 0343 MEST, which should be 0103-0143 UTC. If 
> the switch was done at 0830 UTC, that shouldn't have raised a bug.

the problem is:

    - the mass-check must take place after the 0830 UTC tag time;
    - *and* must take place in the same UTC "day" period as the other
      mass-checks.

So your mass-check was satisfying #1, but not #2.

However that has given me an idea ;)   If I change the scripts so that
each "day" period isn't considered as running from 0000-2359 UTC, and
instead is considered as 0800-0759 UTC, that may be a good workaround...

--j.

Reply via email to