On 03/21/2012 02:31 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012, Axb wrote:

the MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT hits mostly ham using newish MS MUAs and seems
like pointless bloat.
Hits every other message and give a recipient a fuzzy feeling when
rcpt see this hit so often
(sic: all my messages are spam because of MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT !!)

http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20120320-r1302798-n/MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT/detail


The few spam hits from the axb corpus don't warrant this to be kept.

Many moons ago it was a usefull spam trait, but that was way before
Microsoft started using it in their MUAs

Could we remove this rule?

Comments?

+1 for removal?
-1 for removal?

Part of me says "the corpus über alles" and +1 for removal.

Another part of me says "it violates the standards" and -1 for removal.

But most of me says "+1 for driving down to Redmond and beating the
ignorance out of the MSFT mail dev group using bronzed copies of RFC5322".

Seriously, I think we've agreed long since that SA is not a
standards-compliance audit tool regardless of how much some of us wish
it to be, so if the corpus says it's performing poorly then +1 for
removal as a scored rule.

We may want to convert it to a subrule. I'd have to perform a
combination analysis to see whether it's useful with other rules.

My final vote: +1 for converting it to a subrule.

My main aim is to get rid of rules which just bloat/take/time/cycles.. and a subrule is still a pointless rule getting parsed.

If ppl need it, they can add it themselves.
If a sandbox needs it, it will only be published if required

my +1 to kill and leave buried



Reply via email to