https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7735
Loren Wilton <lwil...@earthlink.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |lwil...@earthlink.net
--- Comment #64 from Loren Wilton <lwil...@earthlink.net> ---
Can you tell the difference in the unrun rules list between a rule FOO that
didn't run because it was a net test that timed out (or is undefined, or
similar), and a rule BAR that is unrun because it depends on FOO? If so, I'd
say to zero the FOO result and then evaluate BAR. This is more complex than
simply marking all finally-unrun rules with a zero value, but is I think the
desired result.
I suppose there is a pathological problem of two rules that depend on each
other. That could be resolved by arbitrarily marking one rule as zero and then
running the other. Maybe that is already detected earlier and both rules are
discarded with a lint error.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
