Yes, that one's not going to be back-ported to 2.3. I think it's fine to
proceed with a 2.2 release with what's there now and call it done.
Note that Spark 2.3 would be EOL around September of this year.

On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 2:31 PM Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon.h...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thank you for additional support for 2.2.3, Felix and Takeshi!
>
>
> The following is the update for Apache Spark 2.2.3 release.
>
> For correctness issues, two more patches landed on `branch-2.2`.
>
>       SPARK-22951 fix aggregation after dropDuplicates on empty dataframes
>       SPARK-25591 Avoid overwriting deserialized accumulator
>
> Currently, if we use the following JIRA search query, there exist one JIRA
> issue; SPARK-25206.
>
>       Query: project = SPARK AND fixVersion in (2.3.0, 2.3.1, 2.3.2,
> 2.3.3, 2.4.0, 2.4.1, 3.0.0) AND fixVersion not in (2.2.0, 2.2.1, 2.2.2,
> 2.2.3) AND affectedVersion in (2.1.0, 2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.1.3, 2.2.0, 2.2.1,
> 2.2.2, 2.2.3) AND labels in (Correctness, correctness)
>
> SPARK-25206 ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-25206 ) has
>
>       Affected Version: 2.2.2, 2.3.1
>       Target Versions: 2.3.2, 2.4.0
>       Fixed Version: 2.4.0
>
> Although SPARK-25206 is labeled as a correctness issue, 2.3.2 already
> missed it due to the technical difficulties and risks. Instead, it's marked
> as a known issue. As we see, it's not targeted to 2.3.3, too.
>
> I know the correctness issue policy on new releases. However, for me,
> Spark 2.2.3 is a little bit exceptional release since it's a farewell
> release and branch-2.2 is already EOL and too far from the active branch
> master.
>
> So, I'd like to put SPARK-25206 out of the scope of the farewell release
> and recommend the users to use the other latest release. For example, Spark
> 2.4.0 for SPARK-25206.
>
> How do you think about that?
>
> Bests,
> Dongjoon.
>
>>
>>

Reply via email to