Martin Sebor wrote:
Farid Zaripov wrote:
Why if _PA_RISC2_0 macro is defined the atimic functions are named
__rw_string_atomic_xxx() but no __rw_atomic_xxx() as on other platforms?
I'm not sure but I wonder if the PA atomic functions aren't
the ones that reserve a specific value as the lock value.
I.e., they're not completely general as on all the other
architectures. [...]
That is correct, PA-RISC atomic instructions set use 0 as a special
value. But I do not know if stdcxx choice of names is related to that.
Liviu
