On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Liviu Nicoara <nikko...@hates.ms> wrote:

> I have not created this requirement out of thin air. STDCXX development has 
> functioned in this manner for as long as I remember. If it does not suit you, 
> that's fine.

That would explain why these bugs are present in the first place.

If the "official" method of determining thread-safety here is
fprintf(3C), then we have a much bigger problem than
22.locale.numpunct.mt.


-- 
Stefan Teleman
KDE e.V.
stefan.tele...@gmail.com

Reply via email to