On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Liviu Nicoara <nikko...@hates.ms> wrote:
> I have not created this requirement out of thin air. STDCXX development has > functioned in this manner for as long as I remember. If it does not suit you, > that's fine. That would explain why these bugs are present in the first place. If the "official" method of determining thread-safety here is fprintf(3C), then we have a much bigger problem than 22.locale.numpunct.mt. -- Stefan Teleman KDE e.V. stefan.tele...@gmail.com