On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 21:06:19 -0800, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 20:45:03 -0800, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I agree as well. This lets us follow a consistent approach to > > subprojects, where they may (and probably should) link to Struts core, > > but Struts core should not depend on them. > > I hope this can actually be accomplished ... but I recall playing > around with this particular separation when we had our testbed > Subversion installation, and the interdependencies were much more > invasive than I would have originally expected ... to the point that I > deferred actually finishing this particular separation (since I was > mostly focused on whether SVN made sense).
This actually sounds like a good reason to go this route and ensure that the core has no dependencies on Tiles. If it isn't possible to extract all of the Tiles pieces into a separate subproject, then we have the wrong abstraction, and other people would not be able to build extensions like Tiles without help in the form of changes to the core. -- Martin Cooper > Craig > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
