We might want to keep a straight-line mapping in the naming conventions, where
OpenSymphony -> Apache Struts WebWork -> Action A good reason to prefer "action-default.xml" to "struts-default.xml" is that we want people to be able to use Struts Action 1 and Struts Action 2 in the same application space. We already have a "struts-config.xml". While these file names don't actually conflict, it might be clearer to name the new configurations "action" rather than "struts" to avoid confusion. So, I would suggest that we use "action-default.xml", and any place where we've started to say "struts", we might consider saying "action", so as to avoid confusion and conflict with Struts Action 1. -Ted. On 4/19/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Patrick Lightbody wrote: > > We can definitely start by reading "struts.xml" rather than "xwork.xml". > > +1, works great with struts-default.xml > > Don --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
