I agree with Phil--we need an updated version of OGNL. Last week I was
able to reproduce the OGNL race condition under JBoss on windows with
JDK 1.5. If it was strictly limited to Websphere 5.1 under
Linux/Windows, I wouldn't be pushing so hard. However, it looks like
it's more widespread than that. (Phil's patched version of OGNL
resolved the issue)
Tom
Philip Luppens wrote:
Can a problem in a dependency hold back a GA ? I'm talking about
WW-1615 [1] (OGNL race condition). The bugfix is trivial, but we need
a new release for that. Patrick should have set up Jesse by now (its
new maintainer), so we can expect an official bugfix release rather
soon.
I guess I have some troubles with pushing a GA if such an important
dependency is having a known bug. We're already aware of S2 being
slower than S1, let's not kill whatever performance we have left with
a race condition, even if it's caused by a dependency rather than the
actual framework.
Of course, if this has nothing to do with it, then just disregard this
message.
Cheers,
Phil
[1] https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1615
On 1/30/07, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 for GA. I've been pretty happy with this build and while there are
certainly things to improve (aren't there always?), I don't see anything
major that should prevent production applications from being built
upon it.
Even if the final result is beta, will this release finally be put into
the public maven repository?
Don
Ted Husted wrote:
> Since the Struts 2.0.4 build is essentially the 2.0.3 build with Maven
> fixes, I thought we might as well start the vote. If after three days
> anyone needs more time, or we don't have a quorum, then we can just
> leave the vote open for as long as it takes.
>
> Release notes:
> * http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/release-notes-204.html
> * http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/release-notes-203.html
>
> Distribution:
> * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.4/
>
> Maven 2 staging repository:
> *
http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.4/m2-staging-repository/
>
> Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond
> with a vote as to its quality:
>
> [ ] Leave at test build
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>
> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
>
> Please remember that a binding +1 for GA implies that you intend to
> support the release by applying patches and responding to posts to the
> user and dev lists.
>
> Unless we decide otherwise, a beta vote implies that we will announce
> the build to the user list, to encourage wider testing.
>
> -Ted.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
