Well, Richard Burton is supposed to be working on an MVEL value stack, so hopefully we'll be able to pit them all against each other. :) Tom
On 11/7/07, Chris Brock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > For the record, I still maintain that it's better :) > > > Tom Schneider wrote: > > > > Putting down my work would only motivate me more. :) That's exactly > > how this was started back in February--Chris Brock was bragging about > > how superior MVEL was and how slow OGNL was. Well, we'll show him! > > Tom > > > > On 11/7/07, Ian Roughley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> It's great that Tom is doing this work, and it wasn't my intent to put > >> down the effort. I guess I was just trying to preempt given some of the > >> OGNL threads. > >> > >> /Ian > >> > >> Tom Schneider wrote: > >> > LOL, I didn't know my efforts were going to cause such a raucous. :) > >> > > >> > Ted is correct--I started this on Saturday on a whim. At this point > >> > it is completely experimental--we have a long ways to go before it is > >> > even close to usable. However, I was able to execute a simple > >> > expression using my value stack, which for me, was a worthwhile > >> > accomplishment. I didn't want Don's work to abstract away the value > >> > stack to be completely wasted, we needed at least one other value > >> > stack implementation to truly test his changes. Don did good work, > >> > but there is still a lot of OGNLisms that have crept into the code > >> > over time. It would be nice to find and eliminate these > >> > > >> > Ian brings up a good point in that we'll have to decide how to handle > >> > some things like I18N/type conversion/method invocation. Not all EL's > >> > are created equal and OGNL probably is a little more flexible and > >> > powerful than most. Then even if we get all that working, what's the > >> > migration strategy? > >> > Tom > >> > > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/-s2--extras-lib-%28was-JUEL-plugin-%28was-Roadmap-for-the-core-taglib%29%29-tf4751589.html#a13635524 > Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
