It was a port of SmartURLs and I didn't get everything totally cleaned
up before getting so busy I could barely check my email ;). I'll remove
them.
-bp
Don Brown wrote:
You can remove the author tags, but only the author can remove
copyright headers, unfortunately.
BTW, how did code get checked into our SVN with copyright headers?
Don
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 6:42 AM, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
FYI the convention plugin still has copyright headers in some files
and @Author tags, I will remove them.
musachy
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I will be looking at the Convention plugin for the next few days. What
is broken/missing that is blocking its merge into trunk? I am going
thru the documentation trying the examples myself, and everything
seems to be working so far.
musachy
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 11:07 PM, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think doing an mvn -pAll once fixes the parent pom problem.
>
> musachy
>
>
>
> On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Bob Tiernay
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Brian,
> >
> > Seeing as how I am new to both maven and svn, I'm probably
not the best
> > person for the job. I'm actually trying to build the project
now from svn
> > and I' m running into issues with the missing parent pom.
> >
> > Any help getting this into the next release would be greatly
appreciated :)
> >
> > Also, does this plugin effectively make codebehind and
smarturls obsolete?
> >
> > Thanks again.
> > --------------------------------------------------
> > From: "Brian Pontarelli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 10:20 AM
> > To: "Struts Developers List" <dev@struts.apache.org>
> > Subject: Re: Convention Plugin Status
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > Bob Tiernay wrote:
> > >
> > > > Anyone know what the status of the Convention plugin is? Is there
> > anyways we can get it out of the sandbox and into a formal
release? I'm
> > willing to help out :)
> > > >
> > > The plugin is stable and running in production. It can
probably be moved
> > out of the sandbox whenever we want. At this point, I'm
completely fine with
> > pulling it out of the sandbox. I've been using it for a
number of months and
> > it is fine.
> > >
> > > Anyone else adverse to moving it out?
> > >
> > > Bob, if you have sometime, the move should be as simple as
an svn mv and
> > maybe a little build tweaking. The other thing that needs to
be done is to
> > figure out the documentation home and move the docs from the
plugin wiki to
> > that location. That is if we want to move them.
> > >
> > > -bp
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
